Thomas Wood Mobbs [1786 - ] and Elizabeth[1801 - ]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas was born in Bletchley about 1786 (as we see below his year of birth is not accurately indicated). His wife Elizabeth was born, perhaps in Greater Brickhill (near Bletchley) and perhaps about 1801 (again the census records are inconsistent with respect to age and in this case with respect to place of birth. The Family of Thomas and ElizabethFrom the census and BMD records we are able to create
the following table of information on the family of
George and Elizabeth
Census Records1841 CensusWe located this census record, which allowed an initial
determination of this previous Mobbs generation through
the search for a George Mobbs, about age 12 in 1841 with
a birth in Bletchley (to coincide with later census
entries for George which provide this information as
well as with family records transcribed by Gladys Hart
who was married to a great grandson of George, John
Hart). From this record we learn that Thomas is 55 (born
about 1786) and his wife Elizabeth is 40 (born about
1801). The family has six children, five boys and a
daughter ranging in age from four to sixteen years.
Thomas is employed as an agricultural labourer with no
employment status indicated for the rest of the family.
All members have been born in Buckinghamshire. The
family is living at Bletchley [my year 2014 assumption
is that this is on the Bletchley estate] 1851 CensusThe information gathered in the 1851 census was more extensive than in 1841 and we thus gain some additional data on the family, although some inconsistencies arise.The family is still at Bletchley. We learn that Thomas has a middle name and is indicated as being Thomas Wood Mobs. The spelling without the second 'b' in the surname is used for his wife but the two children still living at home (George and Albert) have the name spelled with two 'b's. The information is written by the census taker. It is interesting he would have used two spellings in the same family. It is quite likely that the family was illiterate and would not have commented on such entries if they saw them. Interestingly ten years after the 1841 census, Thomas is now reported as being 67, rather than 65. On the other hand, Elizabeth who was reported as being 40 years old in 1841 is reported as being 58 ten years later. (as the youngest child, Albert is 13 this would mean she bore him at the age of 45 -- not impossible but also not likely). This would indicate a birth year of 1784 rather than 1786. Thomas and the children are indicated as having a Bletchley birthplace, but for Elizabeth it is stated that her birthplace is 'not known'. Thomas is listed as being a labourer as are both the sons. 1861 CensusTen years on and we find Thomas and Elizabeth living at
Greater Brickhill, Buckingham, about four miles
southeast of Bletchley. Thomas is now reported as being
67 years old (the same as a decade earlier). Elizabeth
is now listed as being 63, which would make her five
years older than ten years previously. I wonder if they
reported younger ages related to their employment?
Thomas is a highway labourer and she is a lace maker. We
now see that Elizabeth reports she was born in Greater
Brickhill. Also living with them at the time of the census is a
three year old grandson, John Cull. Since there is only
one daughter we know of, perhaps this means she married
a Cull. (see below for the details on this) The Marriages of Mary Wood and Frederick MobbsWe saw in the 1861 census that Thomas and Elizabeth had a grandson John Cull with them at the time of the census taking. This leads naturally to looking for a marriage of their daughter Mary to someone with the surname Cull. The Free BMD site provides the following marriage records page:We see on this page that Mary Wood Mobbs has married in the third quarter of 1852. The middle name Wood is new, however, we note that Mary's father Thomas also has a middle name of Wood so this certainly gives us a high probability of certainty. Additionally, we see that Francis Cull is listed on the same page so it would appear that this is the marriage we are looking for. Interestingly we see that a Frederick Mobbs has also married in this same quarter. However we are not able, from this page, to determine if he married Mary Ann Trathen, as another male, William Cork, is also listed on this page (usually these pages have even numbers of males and females, usually one or two such pairs). Pancras and St.Pancras are alternate names for the same area which is on the border of London and Middlesex. One wonders if their marriages occurred in a joint ceremony (which can possibly be determined by obtaining the actual certificates) |